I mean, both set off all kinds of moral red flags, and both claim they function on ‘reasonable suspicion" not ethnicity.

I’m a Canadian-born, atheist (which may sound a bit redundant to some americans:P). I Don’t believe in Islam, let alone killing innocent people over it. However, when I go to the airport, I’m flagged for my name often times. While I’m blue-eyed, freckled with blond hair, my brother turned out differently and has tan skin, with dark hair and eyes and he get pulled aside even more often. We’ve asked; we’re not on any list nor are our full names similar to any persons of interest. My mom (Irish) named both of us after our uncles so our first names are western. They just mark anyone with an middle-eastern *last* name — more so if you "look the part" like my bro’.
In short, I’ve seen racial/ethnic profiling in practice. I’ve experienced this "’reasonable suspicion’ not ethnicity" BS — I’m not buying it.

I’m almost positive hispanics will be singled out with this Arizona law.

Sure, racial profiling MAY be effective at protecting the boarder states, but if you allow the morals [regarding equality] of the country to disintegrate, WHAT EXACTLY ARE YOU PROTECTING?

Brayden

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,